Community: Message List

Re: Black Ops 2 IS GOING TO SUCK

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 09 May 2012 00:20:10 GMT

If you are so focused on helping your team then why do you need a stealth bomber? A remote sentry? The EMP is ridiculous because you shouldn't be able to take out my ospery that I had to work for by getting 18 kills while dying. CoD has never been a team oriented game. K/D is all that really matters. W/L just proves you play with a party. To put this into perspective, anyone can get an EMP, anyone can hop on a flag but how many people can get a MOAB or an Ospery Gunner? A good CoD player is someone who can achieve the highest K/D while being aggressive when he needs to and passive when he needs to. A bad player is someone who runs aimlessly for a flag knowing it doesn't matter because he'll get that 18th kill sooner or later.

Re: Black Ops 2 IS GOING TO SUCK

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 08 May 2012 23:10:58 GMT

No I'm saying don't reward bad players. Can you not read? The support package is good but things like the EMP, Stealth Bomber, Airdrop Trap, Juggernaut(He shouldn't have a pistol), Remote Turret, Escort Airdrop, and Ballisitc Vest. Everything else was fine, bad players shouldn't be rewarded by getting the ability to hurt good players. The objective means nothing in CoD. W/L only shows how much you play with a party.

Re: Black Ops 2 IS GOING TO SUCK

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 08 May 2012 22:48:42 GMT

I didn't know you worked there, glad to know we have a spy that's in on this! In all seriousness, these topics need to be stressed. CoD has been running strong for 5 years now and not much has changed with the developers and their communication with the community. That needs to change.

Black Ops 2 IS GOING TO SUCK

donotreply@activision.com — Tue, 08 May 2012 22:42:45 GMT

...Unless they go about fixing many issues.

No deathstreaks

- Dead man's hand; final stand; painkiller, all of them need to be removed, you dont deserve to be rewarded for sucking.

No killing rewards or EMP in support package

- Again you shouldn't be rewarded for sucking. Support rewards shouldn't kill players or vehicles.

Make the snipers like they were in Black Ops 1

- take notice as to how none of the good snipers cared, only the whiny 12 year old trickshotters did. Sniping in MW3 is too easy

Fix the spawn system

- MW3 Was terrible

Fix lag compensation

- When I take cover, bullets shouldn't follow me around the wall, this isn't Wanted and none of the players are Angelina Joeli

Nerf Assassin/Ghost

- After WaW and CoD4, everyone complained about removing juggernaut, the argument against it was that the next thing would be stopping power. Then people wanted to remove Stopping Power and the argument against that was the next thing would be Cold-Blooded. Here we are now. Just make the stealth perk only able to protect from UAV. That is all. No protection from CUAV and can still be seen on portable radar. Don't make it a super perk again, it slows down gameplay

Balanced weapons

- No FMG9/ACR/GALIL/FAMAS - esque weapons again. Make all weapons equal with their own pros and cons, don't make all around good guns.

Don't reward bad players

- Reward the good players not the bad ones, make this game great for good players and make bad players want to get better

Add incentive to prestige

- In MW3 and Black Ops there was no point in prestiging. Black Ops upped the anti by not allowing people to get gold guns until 14th prestige. Up the ante again Treyarch. Maybe add special weapons such as the crossbow/ballistic knife. Or maybe allow all gold equipment such as grenades, claymores, secondaries etc.

Overall I belive in Treyarch, they did a decent job with Black Ops and hopefully will do better this time. If this CoD isn't good, I am done with CoD. This is their last straw so they better make it count.

NO SUPPORT IN BO2

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 07 May 2012 22:46:11 GMT

Support sounds good in theory, but someone who goes 18 and 30 does not deserve to kill me with a stealth bomber while I'm on a 23 kill streak. They do not deserve to EMP my Ospery Gunner. They suck, I'm good. I should be rewarded, they should not. Black Ops 2 should eliminate all killing rewards and the EMP from support or remove it entirely.

Re: Challenges in BO2 Should Have Higher XP Rewards.

donotreply@activision.com — Sun, 06 May 2012 21:40:00 GMT

Bump

Challenges in BO2 Should Have Higher XP Rewards.

donotreply@activision.com — Sun, 06 May 2012 19:49:29 GMT

In past CoDs after you earned that first glorious 10,000 XP for all that hard work, the next, twice as difficult challenge would be worth a measly 10,000 XP. After earning the first 10k, the next challenge should reward 20,000 XP and for the next, maybe 35-40,000 and so on and so forth until the challenge is completely completed. It adds incentive to go for these higher challenges and overall just makes more sense.

Re: MW3 SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:03:54 GMT

Funny thing is, I searched this "George Mason 15th unhappy" and guess what the second thing was, THIS TOPIC. Leaves me to wonder where you got your statistics. George Mason is a very prestigous school for people wanting to get invloved in government work. "One of the many" is far from the realism (speaking of which I earned an academic scholarship). The fact that you insult mechanical error once again proves your idiocy, logical fallacies as such are just pointless and detrimental to your argument. You have personally attacked me over CoD. Get a job or a girlfriend or something.

Re: MW3 IS THE WORST CALL OF DUTY, IT SUCKS AND WHY!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:04:41 GMT

I have been using Quickdraw since the beginning until now (1st prestige lv 72) And it is not as good as assassin. If they get a UAV you are completely screwed and at a disadvantage because they are ALL using assassin.

Re: MW3 SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:59:39 GMT

I made ONE typo and you insult me. LMFAO maybe my computer sucks every think of that. You're argument has become the logical fallacy of personal attack in which diminishes your argument completely. Tell me how I am a high school drop out but somehow working on a bachelor's in Physics at GMU?

Re: MW3 IS THE WORST CALL OF DUTY, IT SUCKS AND WHY!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:46:09 GMT

I agree, the hardcore gamer is going away and its sad. Every game is doing it however hasn't converted YET. But I just find that game boring most of the time.

Re: MW3 SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:40:50 GMT

You obvously didn't interet what I said. You were obviously implying that the Type 95 was OP or you wouldn't have said it. Obviously it wasn't a fact which brings me to what I previously said "simple-minded and literal"

Re: MW3 IS THE WORST CALL OF DUTY, IT SUCKS AND WHY!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:37:51 GMT

2. Assassin in this game is NOT countered by quickdraw. The reason it wasn't a problem in previous cods is because of SP and Jug. You had to give up something to help you in a gunfight, for stealth. Now you give up nothing. Quickdraw is a near useless perk as it doesn't matter how quick you react if assassin always catches you off guard. Quickdraw does not help in gunfights because of lag compensation, there is no guarentee that you will sight in first due to this.

3. Yes you will end up at the top of the leaderboards, I usually do. However, my killstreaks constantly being EMPed by negative players is BS. Stealh Bomber should be in assault. Any lethal killstreaks (Stealth Bomber, Escort Airdrop, Care Package, Juggernaut) and the EMP should not be in Support.

4.Type 95, is different in this game. There were counters to previous one burst weapons in previous games. It doesn't resemble Famas in MW2 because it can have Rapid Fire and still kill in one hit. No stopping power, and it kills in one hit? It is effective in CQB because it kills in one burst, which will kill faster than any other weapon.

Re: MW3 Worst Call of Duty Ever?

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:29:17 GMT

I agree, lag, support, type 95, assassin, all BS. It isnt the worst, but the CoD series is going downhill. And we all know how unresponsive Bowling is!

Re: MW3 IS THE WORST CALL OF DUTY, IT SUCKS AND WHY!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:20:17 GMT

It just keeps getting easier for shitty players which is why it seems like it keeps getting better to you. I agree this game is better than MW2, but it still has many flaws.

Re: MW3 SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:18:02 GMT

It was a nice way of saying it, if you want I could get you the numbers to prove you wrong and prove that the Type 95 is overpowered. I guess kids are just to simple-minded and literal these days.

MW3 IS THE WORST CALL OF DUTY, IT SUCKS AND WHY!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:50:17 GMT

Okay, the game doesn't suck and it isnt the worst but there are a rediculous amout of issues with it (The title was to get your attention and to see how many people post without reading the topic).

1. Spawns

I have spawned next to player multiple times and have been spawn killed numerous times in a row. Spawns suck.

2. Assassin

Its just an all-powerful stealth perk, it has NO drawback. OP perk.

3.Support

Support is for shitty players. Its frustrating when I worked hard to get a Pave low and it gets EMPed by a kid going negative. Stealh Bomber and EMP should be in assault.

4. Type 95

This gun is a combination of CoD4's M16 and MW2's FAMAS, except its on crack. Seriously one burst no matter the attachment? OP gun.

5. The player.

It is really the player that is the issue here. Everyone in this game sits in a corner with Type 95, assassin and they run support.

I didnt want to draw this out, but these 5 things are really dissapointing. They are aggrivating to the actual good players and I feel CoD has been really dumbed down for bad players.

Re: MW3 SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:03:30 GMT

This topic is debateable as any topic in all of history is debateable. I am confident that I could refute any arguments thrown at me.

BTW It's fact not opinon.

Type 95 is better than any other 3-Burst weapon in the history of cod, including this game. M16 in this game requires 2 bursts, M14 requires 2 shots. Type 95 requires one burst and has a higher fire rate than both. It also has better accuracy. Therefore making this gun the fastest killing gun in the game.

Re: I really don't want to do this but you have to see this.

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 26 Mar 2011 03:11:35 GMT

Kastro187420 wrote:

mufassa wrote:

Thanks that really helps a lot, I was just getting hopeless because I only have 28 subs and I have uploaded 20 vids since like September of this year. I get so excited when I get that email with a new subscriber. To be honest I would be happy with around 100 subs. I just want a crowd. I enjoy uploading vids its just its not as enjoyable if there is no one to share them with, kind of like how money is.

I've always preferred quality over Quantity. And even though you only have 28 Subs right now, those 28 (assuming you haven't done the whole "Sub4Sub" thing) are going to be more quality subscribers than a simple number. 100 Subs that are constructive and genuinely enjoy your videos, I think is worth more than 5000 subs who will maybe watch it, and leave a generic comment.

It also helps to have a somewhat bit of a variety of videos (but still making sure it's something you enjoy). Your channel will grow as long as you simply stay true to what you want your channel to be about. Link people to certain videos if it's relevant to the conversation at the time and that too will help (as I did in that last post, I linked you to a guy I'm subscribed to).

A lot of people tend to struggle with what kind of videos they should upload. They see these director channels that post just "beast gameplay" videos, and think that's what it takes to get a good channel.. but it really isn't. On my new youtube channel, I really don't have that many subs (I think like 4 lol), but that's mostly because all I have uploaded a short theater clips.. but they're clips that I enjoy myself, so I don't mind.

So yeah, my advice, don't force your channel. Let it grow naturally and you'll draw in the right people for your video style.

Thanks I really appreciate the insightful response. I like the content I upload and think that I can always improve. That is the funnest part, improving and uploading what is entertaining to me. I would much rather have 100 subs that really enjoy my content , rather than 5000 who dont really care.

For the record, this is my first time advertising anything on my channel. I don't sub4sub or invite random people to become friends or message random people telling them to check out my latest thing.

Re: I really don't want to do this but you have to see this.

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 26 Mar 2011 02:51:45 GMT

Thanks that really helps a lot, I was just getting hopeless because I only have 28 subs and I have uploaded 20 vids since like September of this year. I get so excited when I get that email with a new subscriber. To be honest I would be happy with around 100 subs. I just want a crowd. I enjoy uploading vids its just its not as enjoyable if there is no one to share them with, kind of like how money is.