Community: Message List

Re: Powerful killstreak

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:20:21 GMT

CPD0123 wrote:

Masinini wrote:

-Counter-UAV's are great! They make them so confused.
-Who's them?
-Hacker's, and people who use Spy Planes.
-But they can still kill you. They just don't have the tactical advantage of the radar.
-Yeah, because they suck without it.
-Prove that.
-Prove it?
-Yes.
-Then how do you know they suck without it.
-Because I kill them
-Oh, so they raped you when they had it.
-No.
-Oh. So basically, you think that they are dependent on it, and you think it really effects them, but you don't know until you've gone off and tried to kill them.
-Yep.
-What happens if they don't need it? Then Counter-UAV is useless.
-Well, everyone needs it.
-You don't know that.
-.....Counter-UAV......
-That's what I thought.

Yes, it is a cool story, and I ain't your "bro."

But don't always assume to know the enemy. I use my radar always, but forget about it the minute it's useless.

And this is why you're a noob if you depend on your mini-map. Noobs who look at their minimap, instead of where they're going and who's in front of them, are idiots who need to learn how to play the game, or keep getting killed because they can't learn to not watch their minimap!

I only lglance at it IF I see a red dot near me, or when somebody says to look where they're at.

I mainly use it when sitting in spot(Sniping) or when we have a UAV. All other times, due to it's small size, the red dots are usually useless. Unless, as you said, a red dot appears near me.

Re: The R@PE squad sessions }:::::::::::::::>

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:14:58 GMT

applesDs wrote:

i think u guys just raped and most ppl arent hackers they are just modders

You have no proof of that.

Re: Powerful killstreak

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:12:12 GMT

-Counter-UAV's are great! They make them so confused.
-Who's them?
-Hacker's, and people who use Spy Planes.
-But they can still kill you. They just don't have the tactical advantage of the radar.
-Yeah, because they suck without it.
-Prove that.
-Prove it?
-Yes.
-Then how do you know they suck without it.
-Because I kill them
-Oh, so they raped you when they had it.
-No.
-Oh. So basically, you think that they are dependent on it, and you think it really effects them, but you don't know until you've gone off and tried to kill them.
-Yep.
-What happens if they don't need it? Then Counter-UAV is useless.
-Well, everyone needs it.
-You don't know that.
-.....Counter-UAV......
-That's what I thought.

Yes, it is a cool story, and I ain't your "bro."

But don't always assume to know the enemy. I use my radar always, but forget about it the minute it's useless.

Re: Sighhh. , its not fun anymore.

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:07:24 GMT

Don't really run into hackers. Never have. One of us has an altered luck.
Also, patches don't help.

Re: Attack Chopper Worthless?

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:04:21 GMT

Know where to place it. If it can shoot people before they have a chance to aim at it, good.

Re: G11 - = Mini grim reaper? And best set up?

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:03:06 GMT

So it's a thread to say the G11 is good. I've gotten dogs and **** with a suppressed commando in domination. Point is, it's not the gun, it's you.

Re: HOLY MACARONI!

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:59:25 GMT

CPD0123 wrote:

Hmmmmmmm... something small here...

Did anybody else notice the little detail that he never showed that he wasn't on ps360? And, how would he have gotten that picture on there of discovery in that private match thing... (had to be, since there was noobtown's background behind, unless he hacked it into there...)

Plus, a side notice, was it just me, or did the reflection at 0:14 and 0:32 look exactly like the reflection in the photo from "what's the cod board think of my top 5?" topic???

Something fishey's going on here...

It's fake or a re-post of a series of videos that went like it. Either way, spam.

Re: TREYARCH IS DEVELOPING MW3 FOR THE WII! CONFIRMED BY IW!

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:55:59 GMT

Here's some info. This is all based off of past COD and is nothing more than guesswork.

-There will be Spec Ops, but most likely not offline split-screen. This will probably include the Spec Ops "Horde" mode.
-There will be lag, because it's the Wii. You can only do so much within the coding if the hardware sucks. And the user's router.
-MWR had good hit detection at the time. There were no other games on the Wii to compare it to. Then WaW came, which had slightly better, then came BO. You can Guess that MW3 will have similar or better hit detection.
- There will be some missing content. I don't know how major.
- It's a port. They are not going to build it from the ground up. It's IW's game, not Treyarch. The only thing I could see possible is if it used BOWii engine, which is based off of the ported MW(PS360) engine. But that's a stretch.
-Cod points were useless. Instead of unlocking guns through leveling up, I had to level up and then make money to buy them. It's useless. And instead of doing challenges for attachments, I had to just make money. Hopefully the new system will work better.
-It's IW's games. there will be differences between it and BO, so don't assume that weapons you like in BO will be the same as in MW3. Furthermore, don't assume that certain perks will be dropped, i.e. Second Chance, because even if they did say it, things change. There are people who won't by the game without Second Chance in, but everyone will buy it even if it is in.

Again, it's opinionated and based off of sense and judgement. So asking for proof is like asking for proof that your screen is on right now.

Re: TREYARCH IS DEVELOPING MW3 FOR THE WII! CONFIRMED BY IW!

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:53:08 GMT

spectere345 wrote:

cod009 wrote:

padiego wrote:

You know, my friend has a website called CookiePuppies.com(which is now destroyed ) that had an article that read:

"Today I was lucky enough to get 14 and a half minutes with treyarch developers. I asked them about the flying treyarch unicorn killstreak, and they said it will be ready the 31st of september, 2011! Looking forward to it! Btw, this is 100% real XDXDXDDXDX"

See where im going with this?

proof or GTFO

no seriously GTFO

you just doomed yourself idiot. not even god can save you now. do you even know who padiego is? he is one of the most respected person on the forum. i can only hope he doesnt screw you up and report you. every1 is gonna hate on you now. i dont want to be on the recieving end on this. if i were you i'll delete your account. YOUR DOOOMED!

No offense to Padiego, but he is not the most respected.

Re: TREYARCH IS DEVELOPING MW3 FOR THE WII! CONFIRMED BY IW!

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 06:27:33 GMT

Burned Toast wrote:

wiiplayaaa wrote:

Guys this is as legit as it gets!!! Robert Bowling HIMSELF says Treyarch is making it...I personally think this is really good news because its MW3 (which means the game is going to be a MW type of game, fast paced, gun on gun gameplay) but hopefully have the good hit detection that black ops has! admit it, did you REALLY think IW was gonna make a COD for the Wii? plus Treyarch has MASTERED COD on the Wii...

Ummm... what? Black Ops has bad hit detection (at least for me it does) and if Treyarch has mastered CoD then why is almost the whole Wii community complaining about overpowered weapons and perks? Does the line "You just got Treyarched" mean anything to you? But enough bashing. I really hope 3arc learns from their mistakes and gives us the CoD we've all been waiting for. And they better not hold back stuff like they did with Five DLC would be nice though...

People whine and complain about OP weapons and such because they suck and think that they're favorite gun should be the best. It's what ruined Black Ops.

Re: NOOB tubes

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:16:26 GMT

Cover-fire FRY wrote:

Masinini wrote:

I love how people hate campers, but without them, objective game-modes would suck.

Camping on the objective is defense and a necessary strategy to win, corner-camping in TDM and FFA is a cowardly way to protect your KDR (likely at the cost of your W/L).

There you go, you specified. More people should do that, and there would be less arguments.

Re: MW3 is it worth it?

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:14:40 GMT

Rated Arrrg wrote:

Ive played MW2 at a friends house and it wanst anything special. I hope this game will be better. Who knows maybe Infinity Ward did us a favor by not puttting MW2 on the Wii.

IMHO, MW2 is fun. The maps are better than Black Ops, again in my opinion. The guns are pretty good, except the OP UMP. The story was spectacular, and the online feels tighter than BO.

Re: nuketown

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:11:12 GMT

Spawn trapping is still extremely easy on Nuke-town.
Noob-tubes are also highly effective on Nuke-town.
There is a limit now to how many times it can be piked. Some nights I played it 8 times in a row.
Any weapon is good there if you are good with said weapon.

Re: Theory on 3arc dissapearance

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:08:51 GMT

spectere345 wrote:

kust too dumb

Fail.

Most people enjoy a good campaign. MW2 had an amazing story, and i'm excited to see how it will progress.

Also, spot the difference:

1. You run down the street with a scar and a tank, telling it where to shoot it's massive weapons, while you move through the houses, killing people.

2. Reading "You freed a small town. Have a muffin bottom."

Re: The Epic Hacks

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:04:06 GMT

Not any zombie map.

Re: Freezing in Zombies

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:02:40 GMT

SleepyOxide wrote:

if you are playing zombies and the game freezes on you, that is a sign you play way too much.

^ Fail.

Zombies was better before they patched, including the strange glitches. They were all mainly harmless, except for the walking through walls thing, but Treyarch patched it and changed it to much, so now it has major glitches, and lags always.

Re: TREYARCH IS DEVELOPING MW3 FOR THE WII! CONFIRMED BY IW!

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 02:55:38 GMT

Just wait til the damn game comes out and then see what its like.

Re: NOOB tubes

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 02:52:02 GMT

I love how people hate campers, but without them, objective game-modes would suck.

Noob-tubes are a pain in the ass. Always will be.

Re: What Treyarch/Activison Have Been Hiding From Us!!!

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 02:50:13 GMT

1. Accidental Menu spaces can happen. They patched zombies tracking, and suddenly, I was getting downed with 1 hit. Explain that one.

2. The idea that Nintendo and Activision had some dispute was proved to be wrong and long while back, when we all originally started whing about DLC.

Quite frankly, this thread contains nothing new. it's all be posted before.

Re: Official: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Discussion

donotreply@activision.com — Thu, 26 May 2011 01:53:14 GMT

I don't really have a problem with knifing. Panic Knifing isn't necessarily always panicking. it might be someone who over estimates the distance, and just reacts when confronted closely.

Don't really mind Graphics. As Long as I can tell that my gun is a gun, and that thing is an enemy, i'm good.

I hope they have maps that were as good as MW2's. MW2 has the best aesthetics and maps, Bo has better Balancing. If they bring the two together, they could have a banging as game. Not those to exactly though. Fine tuning is always a good thing.