Community: Message List

Re: Okay this is a flame but well justified... and its @ Treyarch and Microsoft...

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:31:35 GMT

Ok, I guess I will be the one to say it.

Neither Treyarch nor Microsoft ever reply here. Microsoft for sure does not because this is not a Microsoft forum or site so you wont find anyone from Microsoft. And Treyarch never usually reply here. They may look at the forums to see what the community thinks every once in a while, but for them to personally come on here and address the community is not what they do. This is just a public forum, This does not belong to Treyarch and most certainly not Microsoft.

You are just wasting your time.

Re: Hardcore players

donotreply@activision.com — Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:45:52 GMT

I think it is absolutely stupid how a lot of people also claim it is because of space issues when that is not the case at all.

There is a space issue yet TA and IW keep releasing DLC? If it were really a space issue then they should not be constantly releasing DLC. So you now know they are lying when they say that.

Re: Hardcore is not a "small community"... time for TA to admit it.

donotreply@activision.com — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:30:45 GMT

I am getting the impression you think that by me saying what i am saying, that means i want HC to become the majority. well you can put that thought out of your head.

I know the numbers for HC are almost always going to be less than Core. but a lot of the time that means that some players in Core play Core only because there is no HC version of it. I am not saying, nor do i believe, that by them adding HC versions of Core modes it will increase the HC numbers to the point where it will be a majority. No one is trying to say that. All we want is to be given the same consideration as Core players and be given the exact same modes but in HC.

let me ask you something. How fair do you think it is that the developers constantly get requests for making HC versions of Core game modes, but turn around and ignore those requests while at the same time intorducing NEW game modes that hardly anyone plays and keeping them in the game? Or just doing test runs witt those new modes and if it fails, they continue to think of new modes while,again, completely ignoring the HC community.

Its not about wanting to have higher number in the playlist, it never was. It is and has always been about being treated fairly.

So YOU can either like it or lump it moron.

Re: Hardcore is not a "small community"... time for TA to admit it.

donotreply@activision.com — Sun, 07 Apr 2013 14:10:19 GMT

dude, how can you sit there and spout off those statistics when the majority of the Core playlist has no HC variant?

The way i see it is this, you CANNOT honestly sit there and say what you said since there are not enough HC modes to give an accurate arguement.

and i dont care if you dont like HC. just because you dont like HC doesnt mean they shouldnt add more and it doesnt mean you have to play it. There my be game modes in Core that a lot of HC players play because there is no HC version of it.

so i am going to sit here and kindly say that you can take your stats and shove it since you dont have a concrete argument considering there isnt enough HC to say otherwise.

Re: Hardcore is not a "small community"... time for TA to admit it.

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 06 Apr 2013 10:00:44 GMT

Now i already posted in this thread but for some reason it was deleted by someone. I dont remember the whole thing i posted but i have a general idea which i will sum up.

Fact of the matter is this, TA and IW have a history of screwing over their community with every game every time one comes out. When you look at it HC is technically a majority in its own right so you cant really say it is a minority. I say that because there are only 2 real playlists in the game. I dont count the community one because people only really play that when they are bored. But the sad truth is, instead of making a HC version of a Core mode and putting it in the HC playlist (like the community wants), they would rather try to create a brand new game type that hardly anyone would play and put that into circulation hoping that HC players would forget about asking for more HC modes.

This is the sad truth. and if i come back on here later and see my comment removed again, i will know that i hit a nerve but i will keep reposting it. You cant hide the truth that basically everyone knows.

Re: Cheating - Why is it allowed?

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:15:59 GMT

Jerrylee11 wrote:
People fire guns at speeds NO gun is equipped to do in the game on it's own. The aiming is my biggest problem. As SOON as the pull the trigger the gun goes right to a target with no effort fom the player. This is clearly visible by the fact they kill you so quick, but also in the replay. Also, in these situations, the guns have no recoil. This again is not the way it is for the rest of us. Also, don't make a gun like a shotgun that can be pointed ANYWHERE on the screen and kill a person with 1 shot. It requires NO skill. Oh, and how can I shoot a guy 5,6 times or more with a FMJ attachement and he doesn't die, but one shot from him kills me?

ok, i only have time to respond to this part.

1) modded controllers got out of hand in MW2 when people started using them on Deagles and Barrets, so to combat that, Microsoft stated to license Rapid fire controllers which almost do the same thing but the speed of the shot is slower than what a modded controller does. So that basically makes it impossible for them to ban for modding that.

2) The second thing is called "aim-assist". That is NOT cheating, that is in every single COD game that i know of. You can actually turn it off if you go into the options menu.

3) Guns DO have recoil. there is no reason to explain why since i dont need to.

4) PLEASE tell me which shotgun that is. Because shotguns got the worst deal in this COD game. I dont know which shotgun you are talking about but i have used them all and they flat out suck. I had to stop using them because i would literally get hitmarkers from 5 feet away and have to shoot the enemy 2-3 times.

5) FMJ does NOT allow any type of damage increase on your weapon except when going through objects like scenery. What you are describing is a Stopping Power effect which FMJ does NOT give anyone. It only increases bullet damage going through objects, not people.

Re: Is There Any Way To Get All Of My Stats Back After A Reset?

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:43:56 GMT

Ummm, no. You just admitted that you boosted. It doesnt matter what you boosted for, it is against the rules and therefore you got the corresponding punishment.

They are very strict when it comes to things like this.

Re: Why no sniping maps?

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:50:00 GMT

Apparently you forget about a piece of equipment called the Black Hat. Nuff said on that.

The reason i use attachments is because the default scope is sh*t. it looks like you are looking through the iron site of an AR. the scope is supposed to magnify, not look stupid.

As i said before, i have good awareness but it doesnt help the fact that i should not have to constantly be on my guard because that takes time aways from me being able to snipe and get a kill.

Re: Why no sniping maps?

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:42:26 GMT

Extacly how long have you been playing COD? And the stats?....IW themselves stated that QS make up 1% of the community and less than half of that percent is good at it. So there is that explained.

You must not have been playing COD as long as some of us vets. I have literally stopped playing S&D because of these asshats. And i have been in plenty of DOM matches where i have seen this. And if i have my head up my ass, then why was the MW2, MW3, and this site full of anti-QS threads at a point in time?

dont even try to answer that question, more people than you know hate them just as much as i do. and since i dont believe you have been playing COD for longer than a couple years, i wont even take your opinion into consideration.

(btw, most of those montages were luck shots cuz that is all QS is, a trickshot) And if you believe what you say about the montages, then how about every QS from now on provides a quick look at the scoreboard after every shot before the next clip so we can all see how they REALLY do in the match.

Re: Why no sniping maps?

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:31:08 GMT

I played on every map. I know where the sniping spots are but the problem is the fact of there being too many openings into that spot. I never said there wasnt ANY sniping maps, just that there were hardly any DECENT ones. Cuz the way it works is this, Decent line of vision...Too may openings to the spot. Nice enclosed area.....sh*tty line of vision. That is how this game is now. I have good awareness but i shouldnt have to keep my eyes on 4 entrances all at once to make sure i dont die because that takes time away from sniping and a potential kill.

Re: Why no sniping maps?

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:27:06 GMT

And that is why i absolutely refuse to play Nuketown or Hijacked anymore. I stopped playing Nuketown when all that happened was me being spawn killed the whole time and i stopped playing Hijacked when all that started happening was the spawn was flipping every 2-5 seconds.

Anytime i see/saw Nuketown or Hijacked, i immediately back out of the lobby/match.

Re: Why no sniping maps?

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:08:28 GMT

This is why i say there are bearly any decent sniping maps. There are too many maps that dont have a decent spot to snipe from, and if they do, there are multiple ways of getting into that position making it hard for a sniper to properly defend themselves.

Re: Why no sniping maps?

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:05:11 GMT

And i have to put this out there. If i offend any QS by this, to be honest, i just dont care. And if i offend any "legit" QS (those who play objectives), i STILL dont care.

You guys have to understand something, QS only make up 1% of the community. .01% of you are the ones who play the objective and the rest of the .99% dont care about anything other than their killcams and whatnot. So why should a group that barely even makes a dent in the community be able to whine and complain their way into anything they want? do you know retarded that is? The way it is supposed to work is by having legit reasons for something to be in the game, NOT a bullsh*t reason like "i want a montage so i can have this delusionary satisfaction that people will think im cool" All the while they go into hundreds of matches and go 3-15 just to get that 1 shot and edit out all the rest and put that in with all the other clips where they fail to show how horrible they really are.

You call that a fair system? You see nothing wrong with whining about it til you get this while millions of others complain about stuff that actually matters but dont get a damn thing? That my friend is bullsh*t.

This is the honest truth. To those who QS but go for objectives, like i said this is not aimed toward you, but unfortunately the rest of them ruined A LOT of the experience.

Re: Why no sniping maps?

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:52:31 GMT

and this is what COD has unfortunately turned into.........a bunch of whiney little brats who have absolutely no regard for others playstyle just because they think its not "cool".

Re: Why no sniping maps?

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:50:34 GMT

so let me guess, its all about the QS now? Even though the community wanted it removed but the devs kept it in because they are assh*les.

That is the one problem with this franchise, the smallest group of gamers (less than 1% as stated by IW) gets to keep their crap in just because they whine, b*tch and moan the whole time, but when people have legit reasons for wanting something taken out or put in, they completely ignore it.

This is why i am hesitant on getting MW4. because if i hear 1 mention of QS being put in and dont see any decent sniping maps then i will know for certain that they killed sniping in COD.

Why no sniping maps?

donotreply@activision.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:43:04 GMT

I am starting to see a pattern with these games. I am a sniper but when i looked at the video for the map pack, i didnt see any maps that looked like they would support sniping.

MW3 did the same thing, barely had ANY decent sniping maps. So my question is, why are IW and Treyarch now going away from the sniping community? First they take away decent sniping maps and now ghost doesnt work unless you are moving which means us snipers are screwed ( i can understand they did most of that to try to deter camping, but it affects more than 1 group).

How about actually releasing the next map pack with more sniper friendly maps? I want to actually be able to use my night vision/thermal combo scope and variable zoom but it is hard to do that when they keep releasing CQC maps.

All the maps have been geared more towards CQC, let us snipers have a chance.

Voting for maps but top one gets it when tied

donotreply@activision.com — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:47:03 GMT

Why is it whenever we go to vote for maps there are 3 options and if there are 2 maps that have the same number of votes the map that is on top with that same number is always the one that the computer decides to give us?

It has been like this for as long as i can remember. Doesnt a tie for voting usually supposed to end up with scrapping the original maps and giving a whole new selection for voting?

It doesnt make sense how the same number of people vote for 2 different maps yet the one that is the top most is the one you will play on. And usually it is the one you DONT want to play.

I just dont understand that.

Re: Petition for classic map pack

donotreply@activision.com — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:49:38 GMT

Not going to happen. The weapons for the previous games were made SPECIFICALLY for those games. It is not as simple as "hey lets throw this weapon in and see what happens." You have to keep in mind the kind of maps, tactics and gameplay the other games had in regards to the weapons.

They would have to take those previous weapons and change the stats on all the weapons to make it suitable for how THIS game is in accordance this games maps, tactics and gameplay. And i highly doubt they would be willing to do that since this topic has come up before on previous games but nothing was done.

Re: Hardcore needs more game modes.

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:01:37 GMT

ok, i kinda thought that was where you were going with your other comment.

@JG420:

Dude, just because you know doesn't mean everybody knows. But thanks for the info

well here is the problem, you havent been a member on this forum for long considering you only have 46 posts since decemeber. that is why you didnt know. but everyone who was here since MW2 and BO knew.

Re: Hardcore needs more game modes.

donotreply@activision.com — Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:38:48 GMT

Dude, i vaguely remember the reason for them not adding more HC is because they said that there isnt enough people in the playlist to make them consider putting more modes in.