Community: Message List

Re: CoD meets Halo meets StarCraft

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 09:23:42 GMT

I'm what? I seem to be the only person logically going about this. Anybody can throw out wild assumptions and point fingers, I did it when I was 5.

Re: CoD meets Halo meets StarCraft

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 09:05:49 GMT

Also, Maybe you should research some of the military armor that is already out/in developement.

Some of it looks futuristic, So by your logic, Real life warfare must be like halo. In the sense that you run around and shoot people while wearing armor designed to effectively deflect a bullet.

And as for the arm pad thing that you didnt like, 5 years ago smart phones didn't even exist. Now almost every single phone is a smart phone/touch screen. Do you really think that in 13 years the military will be so underfunded that they can't afford a glorified ipod to wear?

Re: CoD meets Halo meets StarCraft

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 08:57:54 GMT

You are confusing the mission with the gameplay.

Maybe when you get a few more years under your belt, You'll understand how games work.

Re: CoD meets Halo meets StarCraft

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 08:48:07 GMT

I'm sorry that's just not true, Battlefield and CoD do not even remotely play the same. And they are both FPS's .

Re: CoD meets Halo meets StarCraft

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 08:43:14 GMT

I grew up on halo, And then grew into competitive multiplayer through CoD. Those games look almost COMPLETELY different.

What, So if there's an advanced tank, then it must be halo? Where is your logic on this? And last I checked, There hasn't been a gameplay trailer released yet, So you can't really say that they "play the same" whatever that means.

Re: CoD meets Halo meets StarCraft

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 08:36:20 GMT

In what ways are the two games alike then? I'd like to see this one.

Re: I can't see any resemblence to Black ops so why is it considered a sequel?

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 08:28:25 GMT

I know that, that was mainly a response to the people confused on why blackops is in the future. (They're implying that blackops was only in the 60's)

Re: Wishlist for Black Ops 2 (an opinion from a veteran gamer from cod)

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 08:24:59 GMT

Ugh I can't stand killstreaks that highlight me on the damn map. It's like I'm running around with a sign on my head saying "KILL ME KILL ME!" I use assassin purely for the noobs who like throwing up UAVs every 30 seconds.

My style of play is sneaky/flanking, How Am I supposed to do that when a blackbird type killstreak just pops up and shows the world where I am? Sorry. I'm going to have to say no to that, Also, It seems hard enough for a team to take out a killstreak as it is, So you'd have to suicide yourself to get the extra strelas to shoot down a chopper gunner.

I hate killstreaks. If they make too many, They better have a kickass barebones playlist.

Re: I can't see any resemblence to Black ops so why is it considered a sequel?

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 08:16:31 GMT

You do understand that black ops means Undercover operations right? So basically, You could have a team from china, Fighting nazis, Carrying lightsabres, And still be perfectly justified calling it Blackops 2.

Re: CoD meets Halo meets StarCraft

donotreply@activision.com — Wed, 02 May 2012 08:10:45 GMT

Are you on crack? It's like you people have never played halo before. I am dissapoint.